Lake Windermere report casts doubt on speed limit

External Since: Feb 10, 2004 Posts: 6

On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 22:50:05 +0000, Nick
<norfolk-n-hope.TakeThisOut@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

:)pmailkeey wrote:
Smile

> :)Nick

> :)Windermere Action Force
Smile

> :)http://www.waf.uk.com
Smile

>

> What happened to noslow.org.uk ?
Smile

:)You got me worried then and I had to check - it is still there. There
:)was just no point in maintaining 2 sites (well 3 actually as I also
:)have http://www.lake-district.info) so I just set up a redirect to the
:)waf site as the person that looks after that one is obviously more
:)skilled than I... Smile

An illustration of how long my response has been on the back burner !

I did point out in my letter that I had no personal interest in the
speed limit myself - doesn't affect me - but I don't see why others
should have the restriction imposed on them !
--
Comm again, Mike.

External Since: Jan 30, 2004 Posts: 39

On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 02:16:19 GMT, mike.RemoveThis@pmailkeey.freeserve.co.yuk
(pmailkeey) wrote:

>On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 19:04:46 +0100, martin <me.RemoveThis@privacy.net> wrote:
>
>:)When a local authority wanted to close the open air swimming pool last
>:)year a petition signed by 7,500 people protesting was presented to the
>:)mayor. Not bad for a town with a population of 20,000. The pool was
>:)closed.
>
>
>2,500 short of the magic number.

--
Martin