In article <bgb8lb$mnni9$1@ID-163264.news.uni-berlin.de>, "Bob La Londe"
<usenet DeleteThis @diycomponents.com> writes:
>For a small peddle powered craft would a prop design make the best use of
>the available power as well? How in the world woudl you go abotu figuring
>out the optimum size and pitch prop for an application like that?
Speaking academically, there's a reason why you don't generally see paddle
arrangements at Human Powered Vehicle (HPV) competitions. In general, props
are more efficient than paddle-wheels, though it's hard to compare them apples
to apples. Sizing props for HPV is essentially the same as for non-HPV craft,
and primarily a function of:
1) the velocity you're trying to achieve or maintain,
2) the craft's hydrodynamic drag at that velocity, and
3) the power/duty-cycle of engine.
In your case, *you* are the engine. To give you a ballpark idea of the power
you're fitting the prop to, assuming 50th percentile male, 80th percentile
athlete (typical for HPV races), and a cadence of 1.5 cycles/sec:
Continuous .25hp
1-hour .33hp
20-min .50hp
3-min .75hp
10-sec 1.20hp
As you mentioned though, paddle wheels are generally simpler mechanisms -- to
design, to build, to operate, to modify, and to maintain. Prop mechanisms are
generally based off more complicated standard or recumbant bicycles with a
geared chain drive, so sizing the prop also becomes a function of matching your
expected power and cadence to the gearing's final rpm range. For example, in
terms of power, we're generally talking small trolling motor. But it would be
a mistake to choose a .25hp trolling prop optimized for [example only] 300rpm
if the final gearing on your pedal mechanism results in 400rpm. Clear as mud,
eh?! Bottom line is there is no "rule of thumb" prop spec for what you're
attempting to do, though there's a weallth of emperical and anecdotal
information to *help* on HPBoat sites. Just plug "human powered boat" into
your browser.
Warm Regards,
Shawn<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: Peddle Boats