|
Related Topics:
| Stevenson Projects MiniCup 12' sailboat - MiniCup.pdf (0/1) - Anyone built one of these? I'm designing and making a version for my grandson - when he learns to swim he'll get to sail, too!
Stevenson Mini-Cup Changes - I am about to begin assembly of the cockpit and bulkheads on my two Stevenson projects Mini-Cup sailboats and have been some Our coastal area is mostly wildlife refuge with and tiny islands by shallow..
Stevenson Projects Micro-Cup - Has anybody built this boat? Do you reccomend any changes. the age of the plans, are there any materials other than 1/4" ply that would be lighter? I am in building two for my kids.
Lovett Or Rule - I Or Rule?
Lapstrake dinghy made from foam ???? - Am a large lapstrake dinghy (wherry) made from styrofoam sheet and FRG ... as a male plug - in the fashion of a The obvious attempt would be to keep the boat in the range. The sanding, finishing of a..
|
|
|
Next: =?Windows-1252?Q?17=92_3/8=22_Plywood_for_drift_b..
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Oct 27, 2003 Posts: 134
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Mon May 10, 2004 10:25 am
Post subject: Stevenson Minicup Archived from groups: rec>boats>building (more info?)
|
|
|
Got little done this weekend. The nerve of my wife thinking Mothers
Day takes precedence. However, did a little fairing of epoxy on #1
and put one side on #2. Bought a wood plane and shaped the
daggerboard of #1.
Am now leaning toward polytarp sails because I cannot get Tyvek in
great enough width and am not sure of joining pieces. >> Stay informed about: Stevenson Minicup |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 27, 2003 Posts: 134
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Tue May 11, 2004 1:04 pm
Post subject: Re: Stevenson Minicup [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
dbohara.DeleteThis@mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message news:<792abaf9.0405100625.6924a01.DeleteThis@posting.google.com>...
> Got little done this weekend. The nerve of my wife thinking Mothers
> Day takes precedence. However, did a little fairing of epoxy on #1
> and put one side on #2. Bought a wood plane and shaped the
> daggerboard of #1.
>
> Am now leaning toward polytarp sails because I cannot get Tyvek in
> great enough width and am not sure of joining pieces.
I keep finding air bubbles under the fibreglas I applied to the edges
so I keep grinding them out and filling them with epoxy. The
fibreglas seems to have been a mistake because the adhesion of the
fibreglas resin to the wood is very poor.
Found that the rudder boxes I made are twisted so I cut them apart and
reglued them between two cement blocks so they cannot twist.
No progress on #2 yesterday.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Stevenson Minicup |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 27, 2003 Posts: 134
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Fri May 14, 2004 1:00 pm
Post subject: Re: Stevenson Minicup [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
dbohara RemoveThis @mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message news:<792abaf9.0405110904.2f330525 RemoveThis @posting.google.com>...
> dbohara RemoveThis @mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message news:<792abaf9.0405100625.6924a01 RemoveThis @posting.google.com>...
> > Got little done this weekend. The nerve of my wife thinking Mothers
> > Day takes precedence. However, did a little fairing of epoxy on #1
> > and put one side on #2. Bought a wood plane and shaped the
> > daggerboard of #1.
> >
> > Am now leaning toward polytarp sails because I cannot get Tyvek in
> > great enough width and am not sure of joining pieces.
>
> I keep finding air bubbles under the fibreglas I applied to the edges
> so I keep grinding them out and filling them with epoxy. The
> fibreglas seems to have been a mistake because the adhesion of the
> fibreglas resin to the wood is very poor.
> Found that the rudder boxes I made are twisted so I cut them apart and
> reglued them between two cement blocks so they cannot twist.
> No progress on #2 yesterday.
Picked up mast material today. It is 2' diameter and 1/8" wall. This
may be too heavy for the 2 booms for the lateen rig but seems ok for
the mast.
Assembled the rudder assembly last night. By trimming on the rudder,
I managed to get it to flip up much farther than originally.
Nearly ready to paint #1
No progress on #2
For sails, I have looked at Tyvek and although I dont mind putting a
sail together from 2 9' wide pieces, it has big TYVEK letters on it.
Polytarps are an option but color may be an issue but I still have to
look at Wal mart. Visqueen is always an option.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Stevenson Minicup |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 27, 2003 Posts: 134
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Fri May 14, 2004 1:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Stevenson Minicup [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
dbohara.DeleteThis@mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message news:<792abaf9.0405110904.2f330525.DeleteThis@posting.google.com>...
> dbohara.DeleteThis@mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message news:<792abaf9.0405100625.6924a01.DeleteThis@posting.google.com>...
> > Got little done this weekend. The nerve of my wife thinking Mothers
> > Day takes precedence. However, did a little fairing of epoxy on #1
> > and put one side on #2. Bought a wood plane and shaped the
> > daggerboard of #1.
> >
> > Am now leaning toward polytarp sails because I cannot get Tyvek in
> > great enough width and am not sure of joining pieces.
>
> I keep finding air bubbles under the fibreglas I applied to the edges
> so I keep grinding them out and filling them with epoxy. The
> fibreglas seems to have been a mistake because the adhesion of the
> fibreglas resin to the wood is very poor.
> Found that the rudder boxes I made are twisted so I cut them apart and
> reglued them between two cement blocks so they cannot twist.
> No progress on #2 yesterday.
For Bookie B. You sure do things the hard way. Do ALL calculations
in metric and then convert to english units in the end. This avoids
the craziness of converting ounces to pounds and feet to furlongs etc.
At any rate, for a diameter of 2.375" and wall thickness of 1/16" vs
a diameter of 2" and wall thickness of 1/8", I get a weight ratio of
1.6X. The reccomended numbers result in a total spar weight of about
20 lbs while for my tubing I get 33 lbs.
How significant is this? Now, not all the weight is at the top and to
get an approximation I estimate the weight is centered about 6' up.
At a 30 degree angle of heel, this gives a torque of 98 foot-pounds X
sin(30) = 49 foot-lbs. difference between my tubing and reccomended.
This means my 100 lb son must sit about .5 foot further out to balance
it (I do not multiply by sin(30) cuz I assume he can adjust his body
while leaning out to make his weight vector perpendicular to the
axis.). Being 187 lbs, I would have to sit about 4" further out.
Sorry bout all this stuff, but bein an engineer/physics person, I just
luv calculating stuff.
Thanks fer yer help<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Stevenson Minicup |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 27, 2003 Posts: 134
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Sun May 16, 2004 8:33 pm
Post subject: Re: Stevenson Minicup [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
dbohara DeleteThis @mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message news:<792abaf9.0405140957.151934be DeleteThis @posting.google.com>...
> dbohara DeleteThis @mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message news:<792abaf9.0405110904.2f330525 DeleteThis @posting.google.com>...
> > dbohara DeleteThis @mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message news:<792abaf9.0405100625.6924a01 DeleteThis @posting.google.com>...
> > > Got little done this weekend. The nerve of my wife thinking Mothers
> > > Day takes precedence. However, did a little fairing of epoxy on #1
> > > and put one side on #2. Bought a wood plane and shaped the
> > > daggerboard of #1.
> > >
> > > Am now leaning toward polytarp sails because I cannot get Tyvek in
> > > great enough width and am not sure of joining pieces.
> >
> > I keep finding air bubbles under the fibreglas I applied to the edges
> > so I keep grinding them out and filling them with epoxy. The
> > fibreglas seems to have been a mistake because the adhesion of the
> > fibreglas resin to the wood is very poor.
> > Found that the rudder boxes I made are twisted so I cut them apart and
> > reglued them between two cement blocks so they cannot twist.
> > No progress on #2 yesterday.
>
>
> For Bookie B. You sure do things the hard way. Do ALL calculations
> in metric and then convert to english units in the end. This avoids
> the craziness of converting ounces to pounds and feet to furlongs etc.
> At any rate, for a diameter of 2.375" and wall thickness of 1/16" vs
> a diameter of 2" and wall thickness of 1/8", I get a weight ratio of
> 1.6X. The reccomended numbers result in a total spar weight of about
> 20 lbs while for my tubing I get 33 lbs.
>
> How significant is this? Now, not all the weight is at the top and to
> get an approximation I estimate the weight is centered about 6' up.
> At a 30 degree angle of heel, this gives a torque of 98 foot-pounds X
> sin(30) = 49 foot-lbs. difference between my tubing and reccomended.
> This means my 100 lb son must sit about .5 foot further out to balance
> it (I do not multiply by sin(30) cuz I assume he can adjust his body
> while leaning out to make his weight vector perpendicular to the
> axis.). Being 187 lbs, I would have to sit about 4" further out.
> Sorry bout all this stuff, but bein an engineer/physics person, I just
> luv calculating stuff.
>
> Thanks fer yer help
Got the first coat of primer on #1. Got rudder box installed. I like
the barrel bolt idea. 4 coats of poly on rudder and centerboard. Put
mast in place and made shims for it. Assembled rigging and raised it
(without sail). Although theory says the weight of my 1/8" wall
tubing is ok, I am a little worried it is too heavy for my kids. Will
try it and see. Bought a polytarp for a sail.
No progress on #2.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Stevenson Minicup |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 27, 2003 Posts: 134
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Mon May 17, 2004 10:13 pm
Post subject: Re: Stevenson Minicup [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
dbohara.TakeThisOut@mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message news:<792abaf9.0405161633.fca56c7.TakeThisOut@posting.google.com>...
> dbohara.TakeThisOut@mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message news:<792abaf9.0405140957.151934be.TakeThisOut@posting.google.com>...
> > dbohara.TakeThisOut@mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message news:<792abaf9.0405110904.2f330525.TakeThisOut@posting.google.com>...
> > > dbohara.TakeThisOut@mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message news:<792abaf9.0405100625.6924a01.TakeThisOut@posting.google.com>...
> > > > Got little done this weekend. The nerve of my wife thinking Mothers
> > > > Day takes precedence. However, did a little fairing of epoxy on #1
> > > > and put one side on #2. Bought a wood plane and shaped the
> > > > daggerboard of #1.
> > > >
> > > > Am now leaning toward polytarp sails because I cannot get Tyvek in
> > > > great enough width and am not sure of joining pieces.
> > >
> > > I keep finding air bubbles under the fibreglas I applied to the edges
> > > so I keep grinding them out and filling them with epoxy. The
> > > fibreglas seems to have been a mistake because the adhesion of the
> > > fibreglas resin to the wood is very poor.
> > > Found that the rudder boxes I made are twisted so I cut them apart and
> > > reglued them between two cement blocks so they cannot twist.
> > > No progress on #2 yesterday.
> >
> >
> > For Bookie B. You sure do things the hard way. Do ALL calculations
> > in metric and then convert to english units in the end. This avoids
> > the craziness of converting ounces to pounds and feet to furlongs etc.
> > At any rate, for a diameter of 2.375" and wall thickness of 1/16" vs
> > a diameter of 2" and wall thickness of 1/8", I get a weight ratio of
> > 1.6X. The reccomended numbers result in a total spar weight of about
> > 20 lbs while for my tubing I get 33 lbs.
> >
> > How significant is this? Now, not all the weight is at the top and to
> > get an approximation I estimate the weight is centered about 6' up.
> > At a 30 degree angle of heel, this gives a torque of 98 foot-pounds X
> > sin(30) = 49 foot-lbs. difference between my tubing and reccomended.
> > This means my 100 lb son must sit about .5 foot further out to balance
> > it (I do not multiply by sin(30) cuz I assume he can adjust his body
> > while leaning out to make his weight vector perpendicular to the
> > axis.). Being 187 lbs, I would have to sit about 4" further out.
> > Sorry bout all this stuff, but bein an engineer/physics person, I just
> > luv calculating stuff.
> >
> > Thanks fer yer help
>
>
> Got the first coat of primer on #1. Got rudder box installed. I like
> the barrel bolt idea. 4 coats of poly on rudder and centerboard. Put
> mast in place and made shims for it. Assembled rigging and raised it
> (without sail). Although theory says the weight of my 1/8" wall
> tubing is ok, I am a little worried it is too heavy for my kids. Will
> try it and see. Bought a polytarp for a sail.
> No progress on #2.
Painted deck with white paint with anti-skid. I will paint over the
white with fluorescent green spray paint. The anti-skid is nice
because it covers a lot of uneveness from my mistakes. Sides will be
a darker green.
Finally managed to obtain visqueen in 12' widths 6 mils thick so will
use it for sails. Installed all rigging and observed how big the sail
will be, IT IS HUGE. Am considering installing a "Topping Lift" to
hold up the aft end of the boom to take some stress off the sail, all
I need is a double pulley on the mast, another cleat on the mast, an
eye on the end of the boom and some more line. Went with 5/16" line
because it is easier ont he hands than 1/4".
I am a little worried about the screws holding the barrel bolts to
ther transom and am considering fastening a larger plywood plate tot
eh transom with the barrel bolts bolted to it from behind.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Stevenson Minicup |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 13, 2004 Posts: 13
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Wed May 19, 2004 10:03 am
Post subject: Re: Stevenson Minicup [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
dbohara RemoveThis @mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message >
<snip>
> For Bookie B. You sure do things the hard way. Do ALL calculations
> in metric and then convert to english units in the end. This avoids
> the craziness of converting ounces to pounds and feet to furlongs etc.
<snip>
The 55% heavier I came up with is close enough to your 60% as makes no
odds, so I didn't screw up completely (or else we both did  .
Yep, use Metric units all the time, esp. since even I can divide and
multiply by 10/100/1000 without too many mistakes.
In this group though, I think most readers are from the US,
and are more familiar with Imperial/US units, so that's what I try and
use.
Regards,
bookieb.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Stevenson Minicup |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 27, 2003 Posts: 134
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Wed May 19, 2004 2:44 pm
Post subject: Re: Stevenson Minicup [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
tsgtesting DeleteThis @yahoo.co.uk (bookieb) wrote in message news:<4656d732.0405190603.a4f814c DeleteThis @posting.google.com>...
> dbohara DeleteThis @mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message >
> <snip>
> > For Bookie B. You sure do things the hard way. Do ALL calculations
> > in metric and then convert to english units in the end. This avoids
> > the craziness of converting ounces to pounds and feet to furlongs etc.
> <snip>
>
> The 55% heavier I came up with is close enough to your 60% as makes no
> odds, so I didn't screw up completely (or else we both did .
>
> Yep, use Metric units all the time, esp. since even I can divide and
> multiply by 10/100/1000 without too many mistakes.
>
> In this group though, I think most readers are from the US,
> and are more familiar with Imperial/US units, so that's what I try and
> use.
>
> Regards,
US should immediately go metric. I am tired of converting from one
bizarre set of units such as carats/acre-yard into lbs/cubic foot. It
amazes me that ppl put up with this nonsense. Although I am a
Southern redneck american (note capitalization on Southern but not on
american), I strongly urge the adoption of metric. Do all
calculations in MKS system (meters, Kilograms, Coulombs, Amperes,
Joules, etc) and you will never have to convert in the middle of a
calculation. I mean hp?, what is that in a real unit like Watts (1
Watt =1 joule-sec)? The so-called English system makes me want to
express all power units in something like Mt-FN (Megaton-Fortnights).
Back to boats:
The hdwre store reccomended spray painting, BIG MISTAKE. Will return
unused spray cans this afternoon.
I got worried about the little screws holding the rudder assembly to
transom via the barrel bolts and have decided to bolt the barrel bolts
to a larger plywood plate (about 8.5"x9"x3/8") with #8 nuts and bolts
and then glue and screw this plate to the transom.
I did order the lighter weight spars.
When I realized this project was really running up a bill, I decided
to tear up all receipts immediately so I will never know how much
these "Cheap" boats have really cost me.
>
> bookieb.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Stevenson Minicup |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 27, 2003 Posts: 134
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Wed May 19, 2004 2:49 pm
Post subject: Re: Stevenson Minicup [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
tsgtesting.DeleteThis@yahoo.co.uk (bookieb) wrote in message news:<4656d732.0405190603.a4f814c.DeleteThis@posting.google.com>...
> dbohara.DeleteThis@mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message >
> <snip>
> > For Bookie B. You sure do things the hard way. Do ALL calculations
> > in metric and then convert to english units in the end. This avoids
> > the craziness of converting ounces to pounds and feet to furlongs etc.
> <snip>
>
> The 55% heavier I came up with is close enough to your 60% as makes no
> odds, so I didn't screw up completely (or else we both did .
>
> Yep, use Metric units all the time, esp. since even I can divide and
> multiply by 10/100/1000 without too many mistakes.
>
> In this group though, I think most readers are from the US,
> and are more familiar with Imperial/US units, so that's what I try and
> use.
>
> Regards,
>
> bookieb.
OOOps, my metric tirade swhut down my brain. I mean 1 watt
=1Joule/sec and I meant Mt/FN.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Stevenson Minicup |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 27, 2003 Posts: 134
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Thu May 20, 2004 3:29 pm
Post subject: Re: Stevenson Minicup [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
dbohara DeleteThis @mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message news:<792abaf9.0405191049.6c57bdc2 DeleteThis @posting.google.com>...
> tsgtesting DeleteThis @yahoo.co.uk (bookieb) wrote in message news:<4656d732.0405190603.a4f814c DeleteThis @posting.google.com>...
> > dbohara DeleteThis @mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message >
> > <snip>
> > > For Bookie B. You sure do things the hard way. Do ALL calculations
> > > in metric and then convert to english units in the end. This avoids
> > > the craziness of converting ounces to pounds and feet to furlongs etc.
> > <snip>
> >
> > The 55% heavier I came up with is close enough to your 60% as makes no
> > odds, so I didn't screw up completely (or else we both did .
> >
> > Yep, use Metric units all the time, esp. since even I can divide and
> > multiply by 10/100/1000 without too many mistakes.
> >
> > In this group though, I think most readers are from the US,
> > and are more familiar with Imperial/US units, so that's what I try and
> > use.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > bookieb.
>
> OOOps, my metric tirade swhut down my brain. I mean 1 watt
> =1Joule/sec and I meant Mt/FN.
Made my first sail. I am glad I used visqueen because the first
attempt was botched. Yielded a serviceable "back-up" sail but I will
make another.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Stevenson Minicup |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 27, 2003 Posts: 134
|
(Msg. 11) Posted: Sat May 22, 2004 8:12 am
Post subject: Re: Stevenson Minicup [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
dbohara DeleteThis @mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message news:<792abaf9.0405201129.2137bfe1 DeleteThis @posting.google.com>...
> dbohara DeleteThis @mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message news:<792abaf9.0405191049.6c57bdc2 DeleteThis @posting.google.com>...
> > tsgtesting DeleteThis @yahoo.co.uk (bookieb) wrote in message news:<4656d732.0405190603.a4f814c DeleteThis @posting.google.com>...
> > > dbohara DeleteThis @mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message >
> > > <snip>
> > > > For Bookie B. You sure do things the hard way. Do ALL calculations
> > > > in metric and then convert to english units in the end. This avoids
> > > > the craziness of converting ounces to pounds and feet to furlongs etc.
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > The 55% heavier I came up with is close enough to your 60% as makes no
> > > odds, so I didn't screw up completely (or else we both did .
> > >
> > > Yep, use Metric units all the time, esp. since even I can divide and
> > > multiply by 10/100/1000 without too many mistakes.
> > >
> > > In this group though, I think most readers are from the US,
> > > and are more familiar with Imperial/US units, so that's what I try and
> > > use.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > bookieb.
> >
> > OOOps, my metric tirade swhut down my brain. I mean 1 watt
> > =1Joule/sec and I meant Mt/FN.
>
> Made my first sail. I am glad I used visqueen because the first
> attempt was botched. Yielded a serviceable "back-up" sail but I will
> make another.
LAUNCH OF #1 TOMMOROW. >> Stay informed about: Stevenson Minicup |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 27, 2003 Posts: 134
|
(Msg. 12) Posted: Sun May 23, 2004 6:11 pm
Post subject: Re: Stevenson Minicup [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
dbohara DeleteThis @mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message news:<792abaf9.0405220712.239fdfb2 DeleteThis @posting.google.com>...
> dbohara DeleteThis @mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message news:<792abaf9.0405201129.2137bfe1 DeleteThis @posting.google.com>...
> > dbohara DeleteThis @mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message news:<792abaf9.0405191049.6c57bdc2 DeleteThis @posting.google.com>...
> > > tsgtesting DeleteThis @yahoo.co.uk (bookieb) wrote in message news:<4656d732.0405190603.a4f814c DeleteThis @posting.google.com>...
> > > > dbohara DeleteThis @mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message >
> > > > <snip>
> > > > > For Bookie B. You sure do things the hard way. Do ALL calculations
> > > > > in metric and then convert to english units in the end. This avoids
> > > > > the craziness of converting ounces to pounds and feet to furlongs etc.
> > > > <snip>
> > > >
> > > > The 55% heavier I came up with is close enough to your 60% as makes no
> > > > odds, so I didn't screw up completely (or else we both did .
> > > >
> > > > Yep, use Metric units all the time, esp. since even I can divide and
> > > > multiply by 10/100/1000 without too many mistakes.
> > > >
> > > > In this group though, I think most readers are from the US,
> > > > and are more familiar with Imperial/US units, so that's what I try and
> > > > use.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > bookieb.
> > >
> > > OOOps, my metric tirade swhut down my brain. I mean 1 watt
> > > =1Joule/sec and I meant Mt/FN.
> >
> > Made my first sail. I am glad I used visqueen because the first
> > attempt was botched. Yielded a serviceable "back-up" sail but I will
> > make another.
>
>
> LAUNCH OF #1 TOMMOROW.
SUCCESS!!!
Put her on the top of my truck (not a practical means of transport)
and hauled her to Shell Pt, FL, south of Tallahassee. Had 15 kts of
wind and rigging while in chop and wind was difficult but got it done.
Sail kept slipping down the gaff and boom so really had only about
2/3 sail but SHE FLIES. Tacks well, handles well, really great.
Slight prob is that the tiller keeps coming out of the box. Tiller
and rudder box seem a little wimpy as they were both bending under the
load. Christened her as "Tadpole" and she really swims. She does
sorta need coamings as water does come over the bow in chop but I had
a bailer handy.
My 13 yr old son took her out and had problems as he really didnt
understand "jibing" and turned her over twice. I found that standing
on the daggerboard will right her slowly. He eventually learned how to
jibe and to sail her through a tack and he was seriously impressed.
Got the sail adjusted better and my wife and I took her out and she
handles beautifully. Shell Pt has lots of oysters on the shore so she
did get a little banged up as expected but it was worth it.
She did get a little water in her fwd compartment somehow so I will
have to drill holes.
Carrying her to and from the water was a problem so I will have to
build a cart and I also need a trailer for her and #2
I am very impressed. >> Stay informed about: Stevenson Minicup |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 27, 2003 Posts: 134
|
(Msg. 13) Posted: Mon May 24, 2004 6:51 pm
Post subject: Re: Stevenson Minicup [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Andrew Butchart" <andrewb.TakeThisOut@abutchartconsulting.com> wrote in message news:<sOpsc.2461$Hf.1422517@newshog.newsread.com>...
> "Parallax" <dbohara.TakeThisOut@mindspring.com> wrote in message
> news:792abaf9.0405231711.774eea7c@posting.google.com...
> > SUCCESS!!!
> >
> > Put her on the top of my truck (not a practical means of transport)
> > and hauled her to Shell Pt, FL, south of Tallahassee. Had 15 kts of
> > wind and rigging while in chop and wind was difficult but got it done.
> > Sail kept slipping down the gaff and boom so really had only about
> > 2/3 sail but SHE FLIES. Tacks well, handles well, really great.
> > Slight prob is that the tiller keeps coming out of the box. Tiller
> > and rudder box seem a little wimpy as they were both bending under the
> > load. Christened her as "Tadpole" and she really swims. She does
> > sorta need coamings as water does come over the bow in chop but I had
> > a bailer handy.
> > My 13 yr old son took her out and had problems as he really didnt
> > understand "jibing" and turned her over twice. I found that standing
> > on the daggerboard will right her slowly. He eventually learned how to
> > jibe and to sail her through a tack and he was seriously impressed.
> > Got the sail adjusted better and my wife and I took her out and she
> > handles beautifully. Shell Pt has lots of oysters on the shore so she
> > did get a little banged up as expected but it was worth it.
> > She did get a little water in her fwd compartment somehow so I will
> > have to drill holes.
> > Carrying her to and from the water was a problem so I will have to
> > build a cart and I also need a trailer for her and #2
> > I am very impressed.
>
> Congratulations! You've built that boat in an amazingly short time and
> should be proud of your accomplishments. I agree about the tiller and
> rudder box, that's one of the reasons I re-built mine.
>
> BTW - for transporting the boat from my Jeep to the water, I built a small
> dolly out of PVC pipe and it's worked quite well for me - there's some
> pictures on my web-site if you're interested.
Thanks Andrew. I'll have to check over your web site again for the
dolly. Once again, I thank you for your help and posting the plans.
Gawd was it fun. I'll try to get some pics this next weekend at St.
Joseph State park on the coast. I think I will use a small bungee
wrapped round the tiller and box extension to hold the tiller down but
still allow it to "kick up".
More ppl should do this. If I can build a boat, anybody can.
Glued the sides on #2. >> Stay informed about: Stevenson Minicup |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: May 25, 2004 Posts: 1
|
(Msg. 14) Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 12:01 am
Post subject: Re: Stevenson Minicup [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Parallax wrote:
> dbohara RemoveThis @mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message
> news:<792abaf9.0405220712.239fdfb2 RemoveThis @posting.google.com>...
>> dbohara RemoveThis @mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message
>> news:<792abaf9.0405201129.2137bfe1 RemoveThis @posting.google.com>...
>> > dbohara RemoveThis @mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message
>> > news:<792abaf9.0405191049.6c57bdc2 RemoveThis @posting.google.com>...
>> > > tsgtesting RemoveThis @yahoo.co.uk (bookieb) wrote in message
>> > > news:<4656d732.0405190603.a4f814c RemoveThis @posting.google.com>...
>> > > > dbohara RemoveThis @mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message >
>> > > > <snip>
>> > > > > For Bookie B. You sure do things the hard way. Do ALL
>> > > > > calculations
>> > > > > in metric and then convert to english units in the end. This
>> > > > > avoids the craziness of converting ounces to pounds and feet to
>> > > > > furlongs etc.
>> > > > <snip>
>> > > >
>> > > > The 55% heavier I came up with is close enough to your 60% as makes
>> > > > no odds, so I didn't screw up completely (or else we both did .
>> > > >
>> > > > Yep, use Metric units all the time, esp. since even I can divide
>> > > > and multiply by 10/100/1000 without too many mistakes.
>> > > >
>> > > > In this group though, I think most readers are from the US,
>> > > > and are more familiar with Imperial/US units, so that's what I try
>> > > > and use.
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards,
>> > > >
>> > > > bookieb.
>> > >
>> > > OOOps, my metric tirade swhut down my brain. I mean 1 watt
>> > > =1Joule/sec and I meant Mt/FN.
>> >
>> > Made my first sail. I am glad I used visqueen because the first
>> > attempt was botched. Yielded a serviceable "back-up" sail but I will
>> > make another.
>>
>>
>> LAUNCH OF #1 TOMMOROW.
>
> SUCCESS!!!
>
> Put her on the top of my truck (not a practical means of transport)
> and hauled her to Shell Pt, FL, south of Tallahassee. Had 15 kts of
> wind and rigging while in chop and wind was difficult but got it done.
> Sail kept slipping down the gaff and boom so really had only about
> 2/3 sail but SHE FLIES. Tacks well, handles well, really great.
> Slight prob is that the tiller keeps coming out of the box. Tiller
> and rudder box seem a little wimpy as they were both bending under the
> load. Christened her as "Tadpole" and she really swims. She does
> sorta need coamings as water does come over the bow in chop but I had
> a bailer handy.
> My 13 yr old son took her out and had problems as he really didnt
> understand "jibing" and turned her over twice. I found that standing
> on the daggerboard will right her slowly. He eventually learned how to
> jibe and to sail her through a tack and he was seriously impressed.
> Got the sail adjusted better and my wife and I took her out and she
> handles beautifully. Shell Pt has lots of oysters on the shore so she
> did get a little banged up as expected but it was worth it.
> She did get a little water in her fwd compartment somehow so I will
> have to drill holes.
> Carrying her to and from the water was a problem so I will have to
> build a cart and I also need a trailer for her and #2
> I am very impressed.
Thanks for sharing your build process. It's been a great post that I have
looked forward to reading.
--
_______m___õ¿~___m_________________________
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take,
but by the moments that take our breath away".
--George Carlin-- >> Stay informed about: Stevenson Minicup |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 27, 2003 Posts: 134
|
(Msg. 15) Posted: Tue May 25, 2004 7:23 am
Post subject: Re: Stevenson Minicup [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
____m___~¿Ô___m____ <NoSpam.TakeThisOut@NoSpam.invalid> wrote in message news:<k1wsc.9014$o97.1129@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>...
> Parallax wrote:
>
> > dbohara.TakeThisOut@mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message
> > news:<792abaf9.0405220712.239fdfb2.TakeThisOut@posting.google.com>...
> >> dbohara.TakeThisOut@mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message
> >> news:<792abaf9.0405201129.2137bfe1.TakeThisOut@posting.google.com>...
> >> > dbohara.TakeThisOut@mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message
> >> > news:<792abaf9.0405191049.6c57bdc2.TakeThisOut@posting.google.com>...
> >> > > tsgtesting.TakeThisOut@yahoo.co.uk (bookieb) wrote in message
> >> > > news:<4656d732.0405190603.a4f814c.TakeThisOut@posting.google.com>...
> >> > > > dbohara.TakeThisOut@mindspring.com (Parallax) wrote in message >
> >> > > > <snip>
> >> > > > > For Bookie B. You sure do things the hard way. Do ALL
> >> > > > > calculations
> >> > > > > in metric and then convert to english units in the end. This
> >> > > > > avoids the craziness of converting ounces to pounds and feet to
> >> > > > > furlongs etc.
> >> > > > <snip>
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The 55% heavier I came up with is close enough to your 60% as makes
> >> > > > no odds, so I didn't screw up completely (or else we both did .
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Yep, use Metric units all the time, esp. since even I can divide
> >> > > > and multiply by 10/100/1000 without too many mistakes.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > In this group though, I think most readers are from the US,
> >> > > > and are more familiar with Imperial/US units, so that's what I try
> >> > > > and use.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Regards,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > bookieb.
> >> > >
> >> > > OOOps, my metric tirade swhut down my brain. I mean 1 watt
> >> > > =1Joule/sec and I meant Mt/FN.
> >> >
> >> > Made my first sail. I am glad I used visqueen because the first
> >> > attempt was botched. Yielded a serviceable "back-up" sail but I will
> >> > make another.
> >>
> >>
> >> LAUNCH OF #1 TOMMOROW.
> >
> > SUCCESS!!!
> >
> > Put her on the top of my truck (not a practical means of transport)
> > and hauled her to Shell Pt, FL, south of Tallahassee. Had 15 kts of
> > wind and rigging while in chop and wind was difficult but got it done.
> > Sail kept slipping down the gaff and boom so really had only about
> > 2/3 sail but SHE FLIES. Tacks well, handles well, really great.
> > Slight prob is that the tiller keeps coming out of the box. Tiller
> > and rudder box seem a little wimpy as they were both bending under the
> > load. Christened her as "Tadpole" and she really swims. She does
> > sorta need coamings as water does come over the bow in chop but I had
> > a bailer handy.
> > My 13 yr old son took her out and had problems as he really didnt
> > understand "jibing" and turned her over twice. I found that standing
> > on the daggerboard will right her slowly. He eventually learned how to
> > jibe and to sail her through a tack and he was seriously impressed.
> > Got the sail adjusted better and my wife and I took her out and she
> > handles beautifully. Shell Pt has lots of oysters on the shore so she
> > did get a little banged up as expected but it was worth it.
> > She did get a little water in her fwd compartment somehow so I will
> > have to drill holes.
> > Carrying her to and from the water was a problem so I will have to
> > build a cart and I also need a trailer for her and #2
> > I am very impressed.
>
> Thanks for sharing your build process. It's been a great post that I have
> looked forward to reading.
I will try to get some pics this next weekend. >> Stay informed about: Stevenson Minicup |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
|