Yo!! Jamesgangnc!!

If I'm reading it right it's basically a new, very small gate with 16
outputs and conditions instead of the usual one and two. It's pretty far
from a cpu yet but of course an interesting variation from the present
technology. I could not tell if the central node was also able to "store"
something. Or to put it another way how it is "programmed". If you compare
it to our neurons they will need to figure out how to connect 100 billion of
them together. And figire out how to"store" in them.

While it is a different approach from the current massive collection of
binary gates it is still not any closer to real ai.

"Short Wave Sportfishing" <email RemoveThis @swsportsremove.org> wrote in message
news:rnnbt3l0onno90n1a41bns37tr2t8gjik5@4ax.com...
> Remember that AI discussion a while back?
>
> http://www.livescience.com/technology/080310-brain-machines.html
>
> Progenitor of the Positronic Brain? :>)
 >> Stay informed about: Yo!! Jamesgangnc!! 

On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:38:16 -0400, "jamesgangnc"
<jamesgangnc RemoveThis @gmail.com> wrote:

>If I'm reading it right it's basically a new, very small gate with 16
>outputs and conditions instead of the usual one and two. It's pretty far
>from a cpu yet but of course an interesting variation from the present
>technology. I could not tell if the central node was also able to "store"
>something. Or to put it another way how it is "programmed". If you compare
>it to our neurons they will need to figure out how to connect 100 billion of
>them together. And figire out how to"store" in them.
>
>While it is a different approach from the current massive collection of
>binary gates it is still not any closer to real ai.

http://www.lockheedmartin.com/products/Skynet5/index.html

It's only a matter of time. :>)
 >> Stay informed about: Yo!! Jamesgangnc!!